国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2023, Issue (7): 0-0
    
右美托咪定经直肠或经鼻给药对扁桃体/腺样体切除术患儿术前镇静效果的对比研究
苏和升, 季永1()
1.江南大学附属医院
Comparative study of the sedative effect of dexmedetomidine by rectum or intranasal administration on children before adenotonsillectomy
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较右美托咪定(dexmedetomidine, Dex)经直肠给药或经鼻给药对扁桃体/腺样体切除术患儿术前镇静效果。 方法 择期行扁桃体/腺样体切除术患儿85例,按随机数字表法分为经直肠给药组(R组,43例)和经鼻给药组(N组,42例)。两组患儿均在术前45 min进入手术等候区,R组接受3 μg/kg Dex直肠给药,N组接受3 μg/kg Dex鼻内给药。记录两组患儿给药前(T0)、给药后5 min(T1)、给药后10 min(T2)、镇静起效时(T3)的心率、SpO2,记录两组患儿镇静效果[镇静起效时间、分离情绪满意率、静脉穿刺满意率、诱导依从性量表(induction compliance checklist, ICC)评分满意率],患儿给药满意率,家长满意度评分,麻醉苏醒情况(苏醒时间、出室时间、术后躁动发生率),给药至手术结束后2 h内心动过缓、低血压、低氧血症、恶心呕吐、喉痉挛等不良反应发生情况。 结果 与T0比较,两组患儿T2、T3时心率降低(P<0.05);各时间点两组间心率、SpO2差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。R组患儿给药满意率、家长满意度评分高于N组(P<0.05)。两组患儿镇静起效时间、分离情绪满意率、静脉穿刺满意率、ICC评分满意率、苏醒时间、出室时间、术后躁动发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有患儿给药后至手术结束后2 h无心动过缓、低血压、低氧血症、恶心呕吐、喉痉挛等不良反应发生。 结论 Dex 3 μg/kg经直肠给药可获得与经鼻给药相似的镇静效果,作为一种非侵入性镇静方式安全、有效,患儿接受度更高。

关键词: 右美托咪定; 镇静; 直肠给药; 经鼻给药; 儿童; 扁桃体/腺样体切除术
Abstract:

Objective To compare the sedative effect of dexmedetomidine (Dex) by rectum administration or nasal administration in children before adenotonsillectomy. Methods A total of 85 children who were scheduled for adenotonsillectomy were enrolled. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups: a rectum administration group (group R, n=43) and a nasal administration group (group N, n=42). All children entered the operation waiting area 45 min before surgery. Children in group R were transrectally administered with Dex at 3 μg/kg, while those in group N were nasally administered with Dex at 3 μg/kg. Their heart rate and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded before administration (T0), 5 min (T1) and 10 min (T2) after administration and at the onset of sedation (T3). The sedative effects [the onset time of sedation, the satisfaction rate of separation emotion, the satisfaction rate of venipuncture and the satisfaction rate of induction compliance checklist (ICC)] were recorded. The satisfaction rate of medication in children, the score of parent satisfaction and awakening from anesthesia [the recovery time, the length of post‑anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and the rate of postoperative emergence agitation] were recorded. Furthermore, adverse events such as bradycardia, hypotension, hypoxemia, nausea and vomiting, and laryngeal spasms from the time of administration to 2 h after operation were recorded. Results Compared with those at T0, both groups showed significant decreases in heart rate at T2 and T3 (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in heart rate and SpO2 at each time point between the two groups (P>0.05). The satisfaction rate of medication in children and the score of parent satisfaction in group R were significantly higher than those in group N (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in the onset time of sedation, the satisfaction rate of separation emotion, the satisfaction rate of venipuncture and the satisfaction rate of ICC, the recovery time, the length of PACU stay and the rate of postoperative emergence agitation (P>0.05). No adverse reactions such as bradycardia, hypotension, hypoxemia, nausea and vomiting, laryngospasm were reported in all the children from the time of administration to 2 h after operation. Conclusions Rectal administration of Dex has a similar sedative effect as intranasal administration, and can be used as an effective non‑invasive sedative method, which is more acceptable in children.

Key words: Dexmedetomidine; Sedation; Rectal administration; Intranasal administration; Children; Adenotonsillectomy