国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2023, Issue (11): 6-6
    
智能化静脉镇痛系统在下肢骨折患者术后镇痛应用的效果观察
华豪, 徐艳, 王猛, 李鑫, 刘坤1()
1.苏州大学附属无锡九院
Effects of artificial intelligent patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in postoperative pain management of patients undergoing lower limb surgery
 全文:
摘要:

目的 观察智能化静脉镇痛系统(Artificial intelligence patient-controlled analgesia, Ai-PCA)在下肢骨折手术患者术后镇痛应用的效果。方法 选择80例择期行下肢骨折内固定患者,按随机数字表法分为二组:智能化镇痛管理系统组(A组)和传统电子静脉镇痛泵组(P组),每组40例。A组采用智能化镇痛管理模式,P组采用传统镇痛管理模式。记录患者术后4、8、12、24、48h时的静态和动态疼痛数字评分(Numerical Rating Scale, NRS)以及术前1d、术后1d、术后2d的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(Pittsburgh sleep quality index, PSQI)评分。记录术后48h内镇痛泵总按压次数、有效按压次数、舒芬太尼总用量。记录术后不良反应以及患者满意度。结果 与P组相比较,A组患者在术后静态以及动态NRS评分明显降低(P0.05)。A组患者术后1d和术后2d的PSQI评分明显低于P组(P0.05);两组术后48h内镇痛泵总按压次数、有效按压次数、舒芬太尼总用量差异无统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者眩晕、恶心呕吐发生率差异无统计学意义(P0.05);A组患者满意度明显高于P组(P0.05)。结论 Ai-PCA能够提高下肢骨折患者术后镇痛的效果,改善睡眠质量,提高患者满意度。

关键词: 人工智能;静脉自控镇痛;术后镇痛;睡眠质量
Abstract:

Objective: To observe the applied effect of Artificial Intelligence Patient-Controlled Analgesia (Ai-PCA) in postoperative pain management of patients undergoing lower limb surgery. Method: Eighty patients undergoing lower limb fracture internal fixation surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: Ai-PCA group (Group A) and traditional patient-controlled analgesia group (Group P), with 40 patients in each group. The Group A used an intelligent pain management mode and the Group P used a traditional pain management mode. The static and dynamic NRS scores of the patients were recorded at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery as well as the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) scores 1 day before surgery, 1 day and 2 day after surgery. The total number of button pressings, effective button pressings, and the total amount of sufentanil used in the 48 hours postoperatively were also recorded. The occurrence of adverse reactions and patient satisfaction were also noted. Results: Compared with the Group P, the static and dynamic NRS scores of the Group A were significantly lower (P0.05). The PSQI scores of the Group A were significantly lower than those of the Group P at 1 and 2 days after surgery (P0.05), and there was no statistical difference in the total number of button pressings, effective button pressings, and the total amount of sufentanil used in the 48 hours postoperatively between the two groups (P0.05). The incidence of dizziness, nausea, and vomiting in both groups had no statistically significant difference (P0.05), and the patient satisfaction of the Group A was significantly higher than that of the Group P (P0.05). Conclusion: Ai-PCA can improve the effect of postoperative pain management, improve sleep quality, and increase patient satisfaction in patients with lower limb fractures.

Key words: Artificial Intelligent ; Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia; Postoperative Analgesia; Quality of Sleep